AI Cost Calculator / Comparison
Which is cheaper for your workload: Glm 5 or Qwen3.7 Max? Both are scored against the same three canonical workloads below using per-1M-token list pricing as of 2026-08-15. Glm 5 is cheaper in 3 of 3 workloads — but your own token mix decides, so open the calculator with your numbers.
| Workload | Glm 5 | Qwen3.7 Max | Cheaper | Try it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chat assistant 1.2K input / 400 output tokens per call, light prompt caching, 500 calls/day. | $36.00/mo | $96.00/mo | Glm 5 | Open in calculator |
Long-context RAG 100K input / 500 output tokens per call, heavy cache reads, 200 calls/day. | $579.45/mo | $1702.50/mo | Glm 5 | Open in calculator |
Bulk classification 3K input / 20 output tokens per call, no caching, 100K calls/day. | $8739.00/mo | $22950.00/mo | Glm 5 | Open in calculator |
| Model | Input /1M | Output /1M | Cache read /1M | Cache write /1M | Context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glm 5 standard | $0.950 | $3.15 | — | — | 0 | Zhipu AI |
| Qwen3.7 Max standard | $2.50 | $7.50 | $0.500 | — | 991,808 | Qwen |
Cache rates of — mean the provider has not published that tier. Batch API discounts (typically 50%) and negotiated rates are not included — toggle Batch mode in the calculator for those.
Token mix, caching, and volume flip the ranking constantly. Enter your real numbers and compare Glm 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max side by side — free, no account, runs in your browser.
Open the LLM Cost Calculator →