AI Cost Calculator / Comparison
Which is cheaper for your workload: Deepseek V3.2 or Llama 4 Scout? Both are scored against the same three canonical workloads below using per-1M-token list pricing as of 2026-08-15. Llama 4 Scout is cheaper in 3 of 3 workloads — but your own token mix decides, so open the calculator with your numbers.
| Workload | Deepseek V3.2 | Llama 4 Scout | Cheaper | Try it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chat assistant 1.2K input / 400 output tokens per call, light prompt caching, 500 calls/day. | $8.86/mo | $3.60/mo | Llama 4 Scout | Open in calculator |
Long-context RAG 100K input / 500 output tokens per call, heavy cache reads, 200 calls/day. | $211.02/mo | $60.90/mo | Llama 4 Scout | Open in calculator |
Bulk classification 3K input / 20 output tokens per call, no caching, 100K calls/day. | $2445.00/mo | $918.00/mo | Llama 4 Scout | Open in calculator |
| Model | Input /1M | Output /1M | Cache read /1M | Cache write /1M | Context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deepseek V3.2 standard | $0.269 | $0.400 | $0.135 | — | 163,840 | DeepSeek |
| Llama 4 Scout standard | $0.100 | $0.300 | — | — | 131,072 | Meta |
Cache rates of — mean the provider has not published that tier. Batch API discounts (typically 50%) and negotiated rates are not included — toggle Batch mode in the calculator for those.
Token mix, caching, and volume flip the ranking constantly. Enter your real numbers and compare Deepseek V3.2 vs Llama 4 Scout side by side — free, no account, runs in your browser.
Open the LLM Cost Calculator →